Know when infrastructure
starts getting replaced.
StackIntent finds the companies whose current infrastructure is failing, constraining them, or being replaced — diagnosed from verifiable public technical evidence, and staged by how far the migration has progressed. You see the problem, the proof, and the moment the account enters a buying window.
Everyone else tells you who's touching you.
Developer-intent tools watch your GitHub, your docs, your package installs — engagement with you. StackIntent watches the incumbent your prospect is trying to leave. It surfaces accounts entering a buying window before they fill out a form, deanonymize on your site, or appear in any funnel.
First-party signals: your installs, your docs, your sign-ups. Only sees accounts already touching you.
Public evidence of the competitor breaking. Sees the account before it touches anyone. Every claim links to its source.
A diagnosed problem, staged by lifecycle.
StackIntent doesn't sell you a feed of signals. It clusters public evidence into a diagnosed technical problem and places each account on the migration lifecycle — so your team works accounts by how close they are to a decision.
- 01FrustrationRepeated public complaints establish the problem.
- 02InvestigationEngineers research alternatives, compare approaches.
- 03EvaluationTest dependencies, POCs — the buying window is active.
- 04MigrationMigration branch, incumbent removal. High urgency.
- 05AdoptionReplacement persists. Opportunity closing or expanding.
Evidence you can click. Scores you can audit.
Every claim links to its source
Each signal shows the exact public artifact — a GitHub issue, a migration branch, a job posting — and the chain resolving it to a real company, with confidence at every hop.
Scores are explained, not asserted
The buying-window score breaks down into six factors computed at read time. When account resolution is weak, the score is gated — no confident number on thin evidence.
Companies and code, never people
StackIntent builds account-level intelligence from public technical evidence — no individual profiling, no deanonymization, no personal data.
Evidence and inference stay separate
Verified sources, normalized metadata, and model interpretation are always labeled distinctly. You always know what's proven and what's inferred.
Name a competitor. We'll show you 5 accounts leaving them.
A free proof-of-value on your own category — five verified account dossiers, evidence included, no commitment. If the accounts are worth working, we talk about an ongoing radar.
Request my 5 accounts →Or email hello@stackintent.io with your category and the competitor you want to track.